Oreshnik wartime attacks

Oreshnik advanced warning

Oreshnik advance warnings to allow civilians to evacuate to safety if military targets nearby are bombed with IRBM is being interpreted as IRBM with nuclear warheads because of that people believe that IRBMs with conventional warheads would only cause damage to the targeted area, but that is not true.

IRBMs like Oreshnik causes cracks in civilian buildings kilometers away and cracks underground cables like water, electricity and also destroys communication wires.

Oreshnik means hazel tree in Russian.

Suggested improvement

Its unclear what warheads where used in the Oreshnik missile attack at Dnipro. Possibly kinetic warheads where used. Warheads that cause damage by being heavy and travelling fast almost like a small-scale meteor strike. Its possible that tungsten was used in that case in the kinetic warhead.

I would suggest that depleted uranium which has basically the same weight as tungsten but is much cheaper and readily available could be used instead.

Background information

The USA used to be able to park some aircraft carriers and destroyers outside the coast of a nation and basically fear them to compliance. That time is over. The US aircraft carriers are no longer invincible. Russia supports Iran and US aircraft carriers flee the Houthis. Without the power of the US military the US cannot uphold the petrodollar as the world currency and without forcing the international world to use the dollar the dollar will lose its value. Western Europe will be hit financially by the fall of the dollar.

Also the big aircraft carriers are powered with nuclear power and the Oreshnik IRBM could hit these carriers while they are in port, using kinetic warheads, causing the sinking of the aircraft carrier. At Mach 10+, tungsten or depleted uranium warheads could pass completely through the carrier, entering and exiting with minimal deceleration. Same with the nuclear powered submarines.

Maybe global nuclear war will break out soon, but I doubt it. I believe that if they really had all these nuclear weapons, like backpack nukes, tactical nukes, thermonuclear bombs etc then some rouge nation would have used them. They would have obtained them on the black market and used them against their enemies. Even other players such as cartels, criminal organizations would have been able to get hold of smaller nukes and used them. Probably they don't exist and they are just a way to fear people into a kind of hypnotic trans. Hiroshima and Nagasaki could probably be explained by big dirty bombs, the same with the so called nuclear tests. Even a big conventional bomb create this kind of mushroom cloud that is supposed to be characteristic of a nuclear bomb.

Probably the accelerated nuclear reaction that is supposed to happen in a nuclear bomb is just fake science. The real science is probably rather the nuclear reaction that happens in a nuclear meltdown.

Then again maybe nuclear weapons do exist.

Maybe this increased risk for violence and world war is caused by the end times coming with the red horse in Revelation and the discussion in Matthew 24 with a time that has never been before and shall never be again, rumors of war and wars. Also there are other end times verses about increased violence. (Matthew 24:6-7 , 2 Timothy 3:1-5 , Revelation 6:3-4 , Matthew 24:12 , Ezekiel 7:23 , Revelation 9:21 , Genesis 6:11-13 , Revelation 13:7 , Zechariah 14:13)

Updates

The fact that the US threatens with long range missiles deep into Russia and Russia responds with that they could answer with nuclear weapons shows that US/NATO are not afraid of Russia responding with nuclear weapons. This would be perfectly understandable if US knew that nuclear weapons don't exist.

Eventually some so called nuclear bomb could explode in Europe. But it could just be a major big conventional bomb that has plutonium and uranium and maybe cobalt added to it causing radioactive dust to be released, that is a dirty bomb and not a nuclear bomb. But of course it would still cause major damage and fear. But it doesn't mean nuclear weapons has been proven to ever exist.

Regarding weapons of mass destruction the destruction of the electric grid has been estimated could cause the death of 90% of the population in USA within a year. So nuclear weapons are not necessary in order to cause massive death.