KJV discussion 20250922

Written on 22 September 2025.

KJV discussion 20250922

Overview

This session contrasts Swedish and U.S. legal environments around speech and coercive systems, arguing that YouTube’s surface-level uniformity hides the reality that local law governs users. It describes a Swedish, healthcare-anchored “program” (experienced as gang stalking/soft-kill pressure) and sketches how comparable pressures manifest in the U.S. through private/corporate channels. The talk also outlines pathways into psychiatric control in Sweden and why exposing “the program” can both help and increase risk.

Summary

• Jurisdiction on YouTube: You may appear to have U.S.-style speech rights, but once authorities are invoked, your local law applies. Sweden’s protections are narrower than the U.S., creating a structurally “rigged” environment for Swedish users in conflicts that spill into legal channels.
• The Swedish “program”: A long-running, health-system-anchored management plan can involve case managers, social workers, municipalities, and even businesses with in-house legal expertise. It is perceived as gang stalking/social control and is said to aim at soft killing through medical/administrative means rather than overt violence.
• How it differs in the U.S.: With stronger free-speech protections and less state-run infrastructure, comparable campaigns tend to be corporate/wealth-driven: a wealthy actor might hire security/intelligence services to harass or pressure targets outside public view.
• Three psychiatric pathways (Sweden):

 1) Tier 1: diagnosis + benefits; outpatient meds; administrative leverage.  
 2) Tier 2: emergency/compulsory wards (the visible, “white-coat” layer) that coerce compliance.  
 3) Tier 3: psychiatric prisons connected to secular courts; largely hidden from public view, yet sometimes constrained by formal legal procedure, which can occasionally let people out.

• On exposure and strategy: Bringing “the program” to light can deter some actions, but legal escalation can also funnel a person into harsher tiers. The talk stresses choosing escalation carefully.

Transcript outline (key points & timestamps)

(0:01–4:59) Framing: Sweden allegedly runs a “murder program”/gang-stalking model meant to destroy targets socially and physically over time; solidarity among targets is rare. Parallels are drawn to rigged systems elsewhere, emphasizing how local legal regimes determine outcomes on platforms.

(5:00–6:53) Contrast of legal foundations: U.S. presents as free-speech-centric; Sweden is described as collectivist with criminal liabilities for speech even when statements are true. This difference shapes how conflicts unfold once authorities engage.

(7:04–10:38) Application channels: In Sweden, pressure often routes through healthcare (Mina Vårdkontakter/1177), using experts who know how to proceed “within the law.” In the U.S., analogous operations may be commissioned privately by wealthy actors or corporations rather than state systems.

(10:39–end) Psychiatric tiers:

• Tier 1 uses diagnosis/benefits to manage people administratively.
• Tier 2 (emergency/compulsory) is the visible, “benevolent” face that coerces compliance and can harm through forced treatment.
• Tier 3 (psychiatric prisons) operates with court linkage, is kept out of media view, and—precisely because legal procedure must be followed—can sometimes allow exits otherwise blocked in Tier 2.

Selected excerpts

> “It’s a real gang-stalking program… mostly done through social methods… but it also goes through cops and police reports… designed to kill the person—not necessarily by stabbing you in the neck, but by using legal structures.”

> “On YouTube, local law applies. If law enforcement is contacted, that’s when it breaks down for non-U.S. users.”

Transcript

(0:01 - 4:05)
Okay, so I'm live now and this is Mattias talking here then I'm going to talk a bit about the murder program. So they put in Sweden, they put people on a murder program. It's a gang stalking program that tried to murder people. 

It's basically run a bit similar to how Islam works in Muslim countries. So in Muslim countries, it's a rigged system if you're an infidel, if you're not a Muslim. And what that means is that if you end up in court and a Muslim is against you, then they will have, you will have half a witness and they will have a whole witness. 

So you lose, it's a rigged system. That's how Sharia law works. If you're not a Muslim, you lose in court. 

And now it's not exactly the same thing with the murder program in Sweden, the gang stalking murder program. It's a persecution program that is really not international, but similar programs exist in other countries. And there can be international cooperation on a gaslighting level and so on, because people have value systems and so on. 

And there can be gaslighting harassment and even worse stuff can occur. You know, like people can locally end up in trouble if things are filed with the local police and so on. But it's a gaslighting program and a gang stalking program, but it also involves physically hurting the person. 

And they never stop until you're dead. And it's the people who are I've seen who are more, they generally are lost people who do this. I haven't seen much say people who do this actually, even though they can kind of want to supplant you. 

And they can think, you know, they can also go after thinking that you're targeting them or something like that. So they can go after you. But the real bad people in all of this are not often, they are lost people. 

And they can also be religious lost people. Like they think they're God. Like they think they are God, and they want to be worshipped as God or something. 

And they so this is a real gang stalking program, a murder program, where they go after people to hurt them. And it's mostly done through social methods to try to like a social justice warrior. But it can also go through cops and police reports and so on. 

And it's designed to kill the person not to get the person sentenced with some crime or something like that. It's designed to kill the person. And generally the people who are on this program, they don't help each other because they think they're the one targeted individual and that they're worse off than others and that they have more rights to whatever peace and harmony than the other targeted individuals. 

So they don't help each other either. That's what I've noticed. There's no real serious solidarity between these people who are a gang stalking program. 

And that's very interesting itself. Now there isn't much solidarity in Sweden at all really. Anywhere.

(4:06 - 4:59)
So not real solidarity. I mean there is perceived solidarity, but it's not real solidarity. It's not really there. 

So that's what I want to say. This gang stalking problem exists. And it's similar to Sharia law and Islam. 

It's basically a rigged system and it's based on how the legal system of Sweden works. And it's not like in the USA. In the USA, we have freedom of speech and we have or they have freedom of speech. 

And some people on YouTube, they think that they also have freedom of speech there. But no, you don't. If you're not located in the USA, when you say things, you don't have freedom of speech on YouTube either.

(5:00 - 5:52)
You think you do, but you don't. Because that's how the law works. But in the USA, the gang stalking program can work a bit different. 

And let me explain the differences here between these two systems. Basically, in Sweden, a lot of things is state run. Like the Swedish health care system, there's an enormous amount of money in the Swedish health care system. 

And a lot of taxpayer money goes to the Swedish health care system. And these doctors have so much money, it's crazy. So in the Swedish health care system, that's how the gang stalking persecution program manifests, generally through Mina Vårdkontakter and 1177 and so on.

(5:54 - 6:53)
But basically, the thing here is that Swedish has a different legal system. And to define this, to explain this, USA has a freedom of speech based legal system, while Sweden has, it's called a collective based legal system, which means that it tries to help the collective rather than the individual. So in USA, you can say a lot of things to people, and it's legal, because they have free speech rights. 

In Sweden, it's not the same. In fact, it can be criminal. It can be not just that you can be civilly sued, but it can be criminal to say things to people, even if it's true, or to say things about people, even if it's true to say it.

(6:54 - 7:02)
And so it's a very different legal system. And then it's rigged. And then they can rig this also.

(7:04 - 10:38)
The people who are on the murder program, they get it rigged for murder. Then if they don't necessarily have to commit a crime, they can just be assessed because of the system just has the laws in place so they can assess people based on suspicion of mood swings or of behavioral or of acting out in an inappropriate manner or in illegal manner. Or whatever. 

They can assess you for all sorts of reasons for those who are on the murder program. They can be assessed to see if they should be soft killed, be murdered. But this all happens within the legal framework of Sweden. 

So I'm not saying that they actually are committing the crime of murder when they do this. No, it's a murder program that uses a legal structure for the murder. And they do have legal experts that are very good at this. 

They know exactly when and how they can proceed against individuals who are giving no legal counsel whatsoever to soft kill them or to kill them or whatever. But this is done, as I said, within the legal framework. So it's not like they go out and stab you in the neck or something. 

It's not like that. So this is a dilemma for those who live in Sweden because what can they do? Are they going to leave Sweden? Because this is not something you can just jump out of since it's based on the legal framework of Sweden. And comparable to USA, they don't have that kind of legal framework that exists in Sweden. 

So because of the big focus on free speech rights. But they have other problems in the USA. In the USA, it's very capitalistically run or money driven. 

And it's not so much state run as Sweden. It's not collectivist. It's more individualistic. 

But they still have in USA, corporate interests. That's how the murder program was run in the USA through corporate stuff. And for example, a wealthy man that is offended could hire a security firm to go after an individual. 

And that could be a form of gang stalking. And the individual might never know what is going on totally. But this gang stalking can go on. 

Because a wealthy individual just wanted to get even with this person who offended him or whatever. So you cannot end up in a situation where, but it will be a different framework generally in the USA than in Sweden. Where in Sweden, it will go through, the murder program is more likely to go through the healthcare system. 

While in the USA, it's more likely to go through corporations and wealthy people. Okay, so that's what I want to talk about today.

References

AI Disclosure: Parts of this page may have been created, edited, or assisted by artificial intelligence tools (such as ChatGPT or other language models). All AI-assisted content is reviewed by a human before publication. For questions, contact the site administrator.