Fenced brasen wall and YouTube removal
Written on 24 June 2026
Fenced brasen wall and YouTube removal
Fenced brasen wall was a video uploaded to YouTube on 16 November 2024. In June 2026, YouTube removed the video and sent a notification stating that the content violated its policies regarding circumvention and the reposting of content from creators who have been terminated or restricted on the platform.
Background
The video consisted of a clip featuring Alex Jones speaking about intelligence agencies, humanitarian organizations, hospitals, physicians, missionaries, and the events of September 11, 2001.
According to the removal notice, YouTube stated:
Content that violates YouTube's Terms of Service or that encourages others to do so is not allowed on YouTube. This includes posting content previously removed for violating our Terms of Service, posting content from creators with a current channel restriction or posting content from creators who have been terminated under our terms.
The notice did not specifically accuse the video of medical misinformation, hate speech, harassment, or violent content. Instead, it referred to circumvention of YouTube's Terms of Service.
Claims made in the clip
The speaker made a number of controversial claims, including:
- That the modern Red Cross has historical roots connected to the Hospitallers and medieval military-religious orders.
- That humanitarian and medical organizations have historically been connected with intelligence gathering.
- That missionaries, doctors, and medical personnel may sometimes be used for intelligence purposes.
- That physicians can be used by governments for covert operations.
- That communications associated with the Red Cross played a role during the events surrounding the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7.
- That institutions such as hospitals and charities can be perceived as benevolent while concealing other functions.
- That modern power structures often operate through trusted and non-threatening public images.
Many of these claims are controversial and disputed.
Possible reasons for removal
One interpretation is that the removal occurred because the clip contained material originating from Alex Jones or InfoWars-related content, which has been subject to restrictions and removals on YouTube.
Another possibility is that the content itself was considered problematic because it could contribute to distrust of institutions such as:
- hospitals,
- physicians,
- humanitarian organizations,
- government agencies,
- and other authority structures.
The clip contains allegations that, if accepted as true, could encourage viewers to question the motives and legitimacy of such institutions.
However, the removal notice itself specifically referred to circumvention and reposting of content from restricted or terminated creators rather than directly citing misinformation or harmful-conspiracy policies.
Transcript
A transcript of the clip exists and was generated using speech-to-text software from a recording of the video.
The transcript includes discussion of:
- the Hospitallers,
- the Knights Templar,
- the Red Cross,
- intelligence gathering,
- missionary work,
- physicians,
- 9/11,
- World Trade Center Building 7,
- hospitals,
- public trust,
- and the use of non-threatening public images by institutions.
Full Transcript
(0:08 - 0:39) Like take the Red Cross, you volunteer for hurricane, you're great, give money to it. It's a great organization to get down low, but the original intelligence agencies going back to the Hospitallers and the Crusades, that's where the term hospital comes from, a crusading group of knights that also did medical care, the Hospitallers. And this is in the mainline history books that that's where the Red Cross comes from is the Hospitallers and also the Knights Templars was closely associated with it.
(0:40 - 2:12) And today, the Red Crescent with the Muslims and the Hospitallers and the Red Cross is the oldest continually operating intelligence agency in the world. And that's, I mean, you'll hear about how missionaries and doctors on foreign missions are usually intelligence agency. I mean, half of them probably are on average.
I mean, that's because they're there, they're trusted, they're watching, they're getting intel, they can do other missions, kill people, whatever you need them done. That's the government favorite type of assassins, actually a physician. Large cores of physician assassins are already in place in hospitals and things can kill you when they need to, they get the order.
And it was the Red Cross from the police and firefighters I talked to on 9-11 that they heard the countdown to blow up building seven. And the Feds were using, the Feds that were in on it, not the rest of the Feds, were using the Red Cross channels to run the demolition of all three towers. And the cops that were actually getting on that channel were hearing them talking code and stuff, heard the countdown and saw building seven blow up.
I've got PBS when the countdown happened, hey, we're getting a countdown, get back, we're gonna blow it up, get back. And we later found the cops on there that are saying that, had them on the show, they're like, yeah, we heard the countdown, it was the Red Cross. So you'd never think of the Red Cross blowing up building seven, or at least being in control of it.
You're like, oh, that's the Red Cross, nice guys over there. It's like the heart of the Crusaders. It's a military operation, but it's like, oh, we're the Red Cross, we're here to help you, hospital, we're your doctors.
(2:15 - 2:28) So see, that's why they use women now to be all the corporate chiefs that take your rights and sell body parts. And we're just keeping the babies alive, I'm a woman, it's non-threatening. Oh, it's a hospital, oh, it's a woman, oh, it's non-threatening.
(2:29 - 2:58) Because you're wearing a black uniform with a skull on the cap like a Nazi, you're like, oh, that's the bad guy. And they were like, hey, on guard, we're openly gonna come after you. So we're wearing black, we're wearing skulls, we're gonna kill you.
They decided to kind of be out in the open with it. But that's not the way it all works, folks. While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, InfoWars tells you the truth about what's happening next.
Visit InfoWars.com forward slash show and share the link today.
Analysis
The clip is notable because it combines several recurring themes found in Alex Jones broadcasts:
- distrust of institutional authority,
- hidden power structures,
- intelligence operations,
- historical secret networks,
- and media criticism.
Whether the claims are true, false, partially true, or speculative remains a matter of debate. The significance of the clip lies not only in the claims themselves but also in the fact that the video remained online for approximately nineteen months before being removed.
The organic nature of truth and creator-based censorship
One philosophical objection to YouTube's creator circumvention policy is that it focuses on the identity of the speaker rather than the content of a particular statement.
Under YouTube's circumvention policy, content originating from creators who have been terminated from the platform may itself be prohibited, regardless of the specific subject being discussed. In such cases, the determining factor is not necessarily whether a particular claim is true or false, but whether the content is associated with a prohibited creator.
This raises a broader question concerning the nature of truth.
One view holds that truth is organic. Under this view, truth is not produced by institutions or committees but emerges through the actions of living individuals who investigate, observe, speculate, make mistakes, correct themselves, and continue searching over long periods of time. The individual researcher, journalist, commentator, prophet, scientist, or investigator functions as an organic information-gathering organism.
From this perspective, a creator such as Alex Jones is not merely a collection of isolated statements. Rather, he represents a long-running process of observation, investigation, interpretation, error, correction, and communication. Supporters of this view argue that individual claims should be evaluated on their own merits rather than accepted or rejected based solely on the identity of the speaker.
Critics of creator-based censorship therefore argue that such policies do not merely suppress specific statements. Instead, they remove an entire information-producing organism from public discourse. In this interpretation, the policy acts not against a particular opinion but against the continued participation of a specific individual in the process by which information is gathered and distributed.
Supporters of creator-based moderation take a different view. They argue that platforms have the right to remove sources they consider harmful, unreliable, or repeatedly in violation of platform rules. Under this interpretation, removing a creator is a practical method of reducing the spread of content considered dangerous or misleading.
The debate therefore concerns more than any single video. It reflects a deeper disagreement about whether truth is best protected through source-based moderation or through the open evaluation of claims regardless of who makes them.
References
- YouTube removal notice received June 2026.
- Transcript generated from the video clip.
- Alex Jones Intelligence evangelism removed from youtube , https://rumble.com/v7bqx0c-alex-jones-intelligence-evangelism-removed-from-youtube.html
- Alex jones show 20240910 Tuesday, (around 37 minutes into it), https://github.com/Fudge/infowars/blob/main/transcripts/alex-jones-show/2024/20240910_Tue_66e0d894a09fddd478b26b74.txt
- ALEX JONES [1 of 4] Tuesday 9/10/24 • PRE-TRUMP/HARRIS DEBATE COVERAGE, News, Reports & Analysis • Infowars , https://odysee.com/@RonGibsonChannel:0/20240910-ALEX-JONES-ONE-720p:8 , (at around 37 minutes into it)
- Channel or account terminations, YouTube policy, https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2802168
- Posting previously removed content, or content from terminated or restricted creators, Youtube policy, https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2801981
AI Disclosure: Parts of this page may have been created, edited, or assisted by artificial intelligence tools (such as ChatGPT or other language models). All AI-assisted content is reviewed by a human before publication. For questions, contact the site administrator.