The Technocratic Dream and the Cold North

Written on 3 April 2025.

The Technocratic Dream and the Cold North

Recent political and technological movements suggest that the interest in Greenland by American and Silicon Valley elites is far deeper than surface-level geopolitical strategy. The narrative surrounding Greenland often frames it as a necessary component of national defense, particularly against Russian and Chinese influence in the Arctic. However, beneath this veneer lies a confluence of historical ideologies, technocratic ambitions, and resource-driven goals that illuminate a far more complex agenda.

The Public Narrative vs. The Underlying Strategy

Public figures in American leadership, including those associated with the Trump administration, have promoted the idea that Greenland must be brought under U.S. control for security purposes. Political actors have used rhetoric emphasizing self-determination and protective alliances, suggesting the U.S. offers Greenland a more secure future than under Danish oversight.

Yet these public statements mask a deeper push toward incorporating Greenland into a broader technocratic project that includes not only Canada and the U.S., but also Panama and parts of South America. Historical references to a geopolitical concept known as the "Technate"—once advocated by Technocracy Inc.—suggest that Greenland is envisioned as part of a resource and governance zone dominated by unelected experts and corporate figures, not democratically elected representatives.

Technocracy, the Technate, and Historical Connections

In the 1930s, a movement arose to replace democratic governance with rule by technical experts—engineers, scientists, and bureaucrats. This system, labeled technocracy, aimed to manage society based on scientific principles and economic data. Notably, the Technocracy Inc. movement had active branches in Canada and proposed a continental governance zone encompassing Greenland.

One prominent figure in this early movement was a Canadian who led the local Technocracy Inc. chapter and was later imprisoned for possessing Nazi-sympathetic material during WWII. His ideological legacy appears to persist in current efforts to reassert technocratic control, particularly through his well-known descendant who today dominates both space and AI industries.

From Technocracy to the Dark Enlightenment

Closely tied to this vision is the modern ideological movement known as the "Dark Enlightenment," which calls for the end of democratic systems and the emergence of a new global order ruled by a monarch-like corporate executive. This vision is echoed in present-day executive actions that bypass traditional legislative oversight. The surge of executive orders in the United States, transforming national policy at the stroke of a pen, is a testament to this emerging structure.

The AI-Technocracy Nexus

Greenland’s importance transcends military logistics—it holds the rare earth elements vital for manufacturing the hardware required for AI infrastructure. Additionally, its cold climate makes it ideal for data centers, providing natural cooling for the energy-intensive servers needed to sustain artificial intelligence platforms.

Major tech players—including billionaires from the so-called PayPal Mafia—are pursuing the construction of autonomous cities in Greenland, such as the proposed city of Praxis. These projects reflect a desire to create enclaves outside traditional democratic regulation, governed instead by corporate and AI-driven systems.

The South African Connection

Interestingly, many of the figures driving this technocratic push have roots or significant connections to apartheid-era South Africa. Several members of the Silicon Valley elite, including leading AI proponents and government advisors, spent formative years in regions with lingering Nazi sympathies and colonial mentalities. This background may contribute to a worldview that accepts, or even favors, hierarchical, authoritarian control structures over democratic deliberation.

Controlled Theatres of Governance

Insider statements from figures within Western governments suggest that the real levers of power are not held by elected officials. In both the UK and the US, shadow networks—composed of deep-state bureaucracies, intelligence actors, and corporate stakeholders—are directing policy while leaving the appearance of democracy intact.

Former UK insiders have confirmed that ministers and even prime ministers are effectively sidelined by entrenched civil servants and financial institutions. The reality, as echoed by these testimonies, is that the modern state increasingly resembles a corporate-managed structure where elected officials serve as public-facing intermediaries.

Greenland as the New High Place

Throughout history, elites have sought to place themselves in elevated, protected, and symbolic positions—whether in mountaintop temples, pyramids, or isolated islands. Greenland, with its lethal climate, remote geography, and strategic resources, may serve as a new kind of "high place" for the emerging technocratic class.

Like the myth of Atlantis or the symbolic rule of the pharaohs in Egypt, the dream of autonomous cities in Greenland is more than a pragmatic strategy. It represents a desire to separate the rulers from the ruled—not just physically, but spiritually and symbolically. In the glacial isolation of Greenland, AI elites envision fortresses of logic, order, and permanence—protected not by walls but by ice, algorithms, and scarcity.

Whereas in tropical regions like Cambodia people can survive outside centralized systems, in Greenland no one can live outside the system. The cold itself becomes a moat, a natural defense against the angry mob. Energy, data, and protection are centralized; dissent and decentralization are impossible without freezing.

In this context, Greenland becomes a digital Olympus, a Mount Zion of AI governance, where those with the codes and the servers ascend to near-divine status. They do not just rule by power, but by placement—high above, out of reach, and surrounded by symbols of eternity. The data centers, AI nodes, and rare earth vaults are the new obelisks.

The myth has returned. But this time, the gods wear Patagonia vests, build with silicon, and whisper through neural networks.

Return of the Ancient Rulers

This vision of Greenland as a new high place is not merely a metaphor or a strategy of insulation—it resonates with a deeper idea: the return of the ancient rulers. For those who believe Atlantis was real, and that the pharaohs were not mere mortals but hybrid kings with lifespans stretching tens of thousands of years, the Greenland project represents more than technocracy. It signals the possible re-emergence of the Nephilim or their descendants.

In ancient traditions, the Nephilim were giants and rulers who came down from above and established dominion over the earth. Atlantis may have been their former base of operation, an island civilization destroyed by divine judgment. Greenland, encased in ice and mystery, is poised to become their new domain—a frozen throne for ancient bloodlines reasserting themselves through the vessels of modern technology and artificial intelligence.

The elite's desire to rule from Greenland may not be simply about data, defense, or efficiency. It may be about restoring an ancient seat of power, building a throne once again for those who ruled before history was allowed to speak truth. What they build there is not just a city—it may be a gateway, a temple, or a return.

Conclusion

The push for Greenland is not merely a geopolitical maneuver—it represents a broader strategy to consolidate resources, implement AI governance, and dismantle traditional democracy in favor of a technocratic world order. The fusion of AI, rare earth resource extraction, executive-driven governance, and post-democratic ideology points to a future where the true rulers are unelected, unaccountable, and deeply embedded within a global technological framework.