The EU's 700 Billion Euro War Economy: A War Against Its Own People?

From Prophet Mattias
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The EU's 700 Billion Euro War Economy: A War Against Its Own People?

The European Union is preparing to embark on a 700 billion euro military spending spree, supposedly to bolster its defense in the face of global instability. Yet, upon closer examination, this move appears increasingly unjustified and suspicious. Unlike historical precedents such as Nazi Germany’s rearmament under the Treaty of Versailles, the EU faces no direct existential threat from an external enemy. Russia has not indicated any plan to invade the EU, nor have Iran, China, or the United States. So why is the EU moving toward a wartime economy without a war?

The Perpetual War Economy: A Manufactured Crisis?

A key pattern emerges when we examine history—pandemics, economic crises, and war often go hand in hand. Prior to World War I, a polio epidemic and widespread tuberculosis outbreaks destabilized nations. Similarly, before this push for a wartime economy, COVID-19 ravaged economies and justified massive state intervention.

Now, Europe is transitioning into a wartime economy with no clear enemy, raising the question: Is this war truly external, or is it against the people of Europe themselves?

Who Benefits from This Military Buildup?

If there is no real invasion threat, then the only logical conclusion is that this military buildup serves other interests. The primary beneficiaries include:

- The EU Bureaucracy: Unelected figures like Ursula von der Leyen and the European Commission are consolidating greater central power, circumventing democratic accountability. - The Military-Industrial Complex: Defense contractors, arms manufacturers, and financial elites stand to profit massively from a continuous cycle of military spending. - Globalist Institutions (WEF, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group): These groups have long pushed for centralized control, and a permanent wartime economy justifies tighter regulation, surveillance, and financial dependency on Brussels. - Big Banks & Financial Institutions: Debt-financed military spending ensures greater economic control, forcing nations deeper into financial reliance on the EU.

A War Against the Middle Class?

Just as COVID-19 policies devastated small businesses and transferred wealth to multinational corporations, this militarization will:

- Increase taxation and inflation, eroding middle-class savings and wages. - Push EU nations deeper into debt, ensuring long-term dependence on centralized economic policies. - Expand government control over resources, finances, and industry, further reducing individual freedoms. - Criminalize dissent—questioning the war economy could soon be labeled as a national security threat.

The Manufactured Enemy & The Justification for Endless Control

Since there is no genuine external military threat, the EU must manufacture one. This could take various forms:

  1. Perpetual Fear of Russian Aggression: Even if Russia has no plans to invade the EU, the mere possibility is enough to justify continuous military spending.
  1. Shifting Blame to "Internal Enemies": Just as the EU labeled vaccine skeptics as dangerous extremists, war critics may soon be accused of being “pro-Russian” or threats to democracy.
  1. Permanent Crisis Justifies Permanent Control: If the EU maintains a state of perpetual emergency, it can continue censoring opposition, increasing surveillance, and expanding central power.

Conclusion: A War Without an Enemy

If this 700 billion euro military expansion was truly about security, there would be a clear and present external danger. Instead, it appears to be a war against the European people themselves, designed to:

- Destroy the middle class through debt and inflation. - Centralize power within the EU bureaucracy. - Ensure the financial elite profit from a permanent wartime economy. - Suppress political dissent under the guise of national security.

The real question remains: Will Europeans wake up to this deception in time, or is the EU already too entrenched in its path toward authoritarian militarization?