KJV discussion 20250923

Written on 23 September 2025.

KJV discussion 20250923

Overview

This talk reflects on an ongoing YouTube conflict within the faith-alone / KJV space (notably involving Jacksmack77 and Mike), and uses it to explore how platform dynamics, audience incentives, and local law intersect. The speaker argues that while YouTube operates from the U.S., local jurisdiction governs users once authorities are involved; thus speech risks vary by country. The discussion then contrasts styles of ministry (evangelistic emphasis that can drift toward soft lordship vs. more Orthodox-sounding presentation), and closes with a practical picture of status, influence, and institutional responses that shape online Christian debates.

Summary

• Context of the dispute: Viewers on a larger channel pressed the host to “expose” a smaller creator; the resulting short was satirical/derogatory but stopped short of calling him unsaved. The speaker frames this as audience-driven rather than purely personal animus.
• Local law vs. platform feel: People assume U.S.-style speech norms on YouTube, but if anything escalates to law enforcement, the user’s local law applies. This produces asymmetric risk for non-U.S. users.
• Soft lordship concern: The speaker regards Jacksmack77 as clear on the gospel, yet worries that an implied expectation of measurable evangelistic fruit can function as soft lordship even if not stated as a requirement for salvation.
• Style and identity: The speaker sketches Baptist “Trail of Blood” sensibilities versus a more Orthodox-toned presentation, suggesting “history rhymes” in how groups perceive and critique each other.
• Bottom line: Clarity on the gospel (e.g., 1 Corinthians 15:1–4) is affirmed, while recognizing how channel incentives and audience demands can warp tone, targets, and tactics in Christian YouTube spaces.

Transcript outline

(0:00–5:00) Set-up: microphone aside; frame the YouTube dispute and audience pressure dynamics. (5:00–12:00) On influence, reach, and “doing what people like to hear” vs. doctrinal accuracy. (12:00–18:00) Soft lordship concern tied to evangelistic fruit language; distinction between explicit doctrine and implied expectations. (18:00–21:12) Baptist/Orthodox tone contrast; “history rhymes” motif; reiteration that the larger creator did not declare the other unsaved in the short.

Transcript

{{New transcript of the 2025-09-23 session (YouTube id: lH8P0Cnj_Zo).}}

(0:00 - 21:12)
Hello hello hello hello hello Hello hello hello hello Hello hello hello hello indestructble microphone 90 or I don't know what it is SM it's it's I think Mick Jagger had my Mick Jagger I think had this microphone and it's called the indestructible microphone because they have run it in a washing machine or laundry machine or what it was and it survived it it's also been run over by a truck and survived that what was usable afterwards so this the microphone I'm using I'm gonna talk a bit about today the ongoing Christian conflict here on YouTube in the faith alone Kingdoms Bible movement where there's been a conflict about between some so they have these panels they have these followings and so on and then they have a conflict and Jack smack Jack smack and and Mike has had a conflict or and it's probably in a sense looking for attention and and so on Jack smack having about 10,000 subscribers and Mike having about 2,000 subscribers so it's obviously Jack smack that is the big guy here and Mike seems to claim that Jack smack here he's doing this because he's insecure so so Jack smack has done a short about Mike which is a bit satirical maybe but it's yeah it's a bit satirical maybe but before that Mike did videos about Jack smack claiming that Jack smack what was 100% unsaved and he did this because of that Jack smack makes videos claiming that Mike claiming that these Calvin it's our hump 100% unsaved and then he don't you see him and be or or that they must be unsafe so there's a lot of this going on about hypocrisy if you claim you can be 100% sure that someone else is 100% unsaved then you're unsaved or something I don't know but it's really a kind of either way my point here what this really is is that what what Jack smack did was they do a video that was negatively about Mike about his his life and everything and his person and everything and that is legal to do in the USA you can be derogatory you can do this kind of derogatory videos in use and what I see with Jack smack is two things first of all he does things that that people like listening to okay so he has that ability to do things that people are pleased I personally believe that Jack smack lives in California maybe outside of the of Los Angeles or something he's a lawnmower guy he moves lawns with with his lawnmower and he's Bob believe probably I knew our new IFP I think it's called in the independent fundamental Baptist connected to some degree and I believe that he what I've heard about California it's quite interesting California it's not really Republican it's a bit more Democrat right it's Democrat I don't believe Jack's Mike is Democrat though I believe he's Christ correct so to speak but if you live in that area which I believe it does due to his upload times looking at when he uploads videos it looks like he would live in Western USA there like like California or something if you live in that area what I've heard about California is that they have all kinds of personalities there and all kinds of people a lot of odd people but it's not about the right to to live on tax money you know what what California is about there are a lot of different people but they have their original sting they have their individual they are individuals California even though it's they have their original thing that they can make money on or that they can get influence from Jack's Mike is able to influence I don't know really if he really makes money to that degree but he does have the ability to influence due to his reach with on YouTube return 10k subscribers and so on so he does he's an influencer Jack's Mike and and not everyone very few people are able to do that and what I'm saying is in California it's what you can do and make a living on make money on yeah and doesn't matter what it is I mean it can be something odd like singing or whatever California has a lot of those kind of people artists and all these kind of people is not you know it's just that you're doing what you're you're doing your talent and you do it and it's a bit connected to the American dream in that way while I think that that's more the point what this is about that some people are in the East are more institutionalized you know living on on taxpayer money and then so on and and that's a it's a different world in California in that sense and I think that I think personally that it's not necessarily that someone is insecure that they make a video about someone else they what happened on Jack's max panel that channel was that some of his followers were bringing up Jack's were bringing up Mike and said we want you to expose this guy and you know that's when Jack's Mike does something when they when his own followers ask him to expose someone and it seems to be a fan of Jack's Mike that this guy was bringing up wanted to expose this Mike because you know he says you aren't a percent on saved and so on and so it become the you you have he had disrespected you here on YouTube he's made videos about you on YouTube saying you this hundred percent certain that you that you run that you Jack's macaron saved so then he really needs to to to make a video short against this guy not because he really wants to or cares he doesn't care about Mike he said that he doesn't care about Mike he doesn't know Mike and Mike doesn't know him but his followers demands it it's followers demands that he makes a video against this guy you know these followers demanded that he make a video against this guy claiming that he's unsafe now Jack's Mike as I understand he said he's a literate person and I when I say literate I mean a lot of people are literate but Jack's Mike I think I've studied English and his English is he has a lot of words that even people who know English don't understand they have to look them up so he has a big vocabulary but that could be because he studied English or in a higher education college level English which I think he has done so but anyway Jack's Mike in this little short about Mike he does not claim he's lost you know so Jack's Mike tries to be correct in his in his in his videos about people tries to be correct and I'm not saying Mike is lost or saved I'm just saying that that we don't if we don't have proof on video that we can use claiming he's lost or something then it becomes incorrect to claim that he's lost but his followers wanted wanted wanted Jack's Mike to say that Mike was lost but he did not say that and why these followers want him to say that well it's like an inner cult almost like it's a cult driven thing in the per channel and it's like you believe like I do then you say like Jack's Mike believes his way I I personally think that Jack's Mike is correct on the gospel but I think that there can be elements of Lordship in that that sneak in into his preaching that it's a kind of soft Lordship that is not literally spoken it's not literally there but it's intuitively kind of seen and that can be a Lordship that is connected to evangelism and Jack's Mike did a video the root the root and the fruit I think it was called and in this video he he made he talked about that the work salvation is they they look at work as the as a fruit and then later in this video he said that proof it didn't say it was proof but he insinuated or implied that that you that if you get people saved if you don't get people saved you're not saved and if you get people saved you're saved so so and that's a work right to evangelize so so there he had implied that work was necessary for salvation but he didn't say that he didn't say work was necessary so I'm not saying he's saying that but you see it's implied so that's what I call soft Lordship when and Jack's Mike soft Lordship is connected to evangelism but it's not it's not it's not literally saying it so you can't say it's wrong on the gospel because it's not wrong on the gospel he's correct on the gospel but it's the creeps in a bit of soft Lordship that is implied but not spoken out kind of and so it's correct on the gospel and this crossless gospel discussion there is also another element between this this conflict or this whatever it is I think it's not necessarily conflict it could be Mike that is looking for traffic and attention and therefore he's trying to to expose Jack's Mac because Jack's Mac have 10k followers and Mike has 2k followers so he tries to expose Jack's Mac by making videos that are titled Jack's Mac at YouTube in YouTube so that traffic his followers Jack's Mac followers will catch these videos and view them and then contact Jack's my there's gonna be some kind of interaction and hopefully in Mike's case by probably hope this will lead to more traffic for him or something but I think Mike actually believes that Jack's Mac is preaching a false gospel and therefore it's hurting people because he said something like that now I do not preach I do not believe that Jack's Mac is preaching a false gospel and this is interesting because this is a thing that is interesting in itself I'm going to talk about that now so history rhymes it says history does not repeat itself but history rhymes and that's what we see between Jack's back in my opinion and Mike Jack's Mac is a Baptist and the trail of blood is a book about the how the Baptists were persecuted by for example Catholic Church and by these is to institutionalize churches and Mike has called himself I think he called himself the original undefiled Orthodox faith he called himself the original undefiled Orthodox faith now that can be interpreted in different way it doesn't necessarily mean it's the institutionalized Orthodox Church that is referring to but it does indicate and Mike does have a tone or he does look more Catholic in his what is in a in a approach to faith even though he is faith alone Jack's Mac no I see Mike in Mike is faith alone so but there's something about his tone which is more or the way he presents stuff that is more Orthodox which is connected to Catholic so there is a Catholic tone to it or and it could be that history rhymes with Jack's might be connected more to the Baptist independent fundamental Baptist which are really connected to the trail of blood the book the trail of blood which is central to Baptist theology I think the book the trail of blood which basically portrays their theology as being a persecuted theology to the point of physical death that's why it says trail of blood by for example these the Orthodox Catholic Church so there could be that history rhymes so we have this we have this conflict going on where as Mike says thinks that Jack's Mac is doing evil because of that he is preaching of false gospel and that false gospel my claims is the crossless gospel now is it the crossless gospel I personally believe so that it's not a crossless boss gospel but it is an ambiguous gospel in the sense that it can be misunderstood in a way that but I don't think there is a simplicity in Christ and but the core the gospel is defined in 1 Corinthians 15 verse 1 to 4 so and that is the gospel it says so the kingdom's Bible is the truth the Word of God so but I don't believe it's a crossless gospel that's another discussion that can take some time to explain but I don't believe it's a crossless gospel I don't believe the crossless gospel is a crossless gospel but it can be wiser to say the complete gospel Jesus Christ had died on the on the cross for your sins been buried and resurrected on the third day if you and if you believe in him you receive us a free gift eternal life in heaven now it is true also that if you don't believe you're a sinner because I met these people who don't believe they are sinners and they're not on the same ball they're not on the same you know wavelength you know they don't understand this so he has died for your sins on the cross but yeah he has died for your sins on the cross but okay but this is about explaining the gospel now the way it comes to a crossless gospel the crossless gospel is simply believe only the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved so because Jesus Christ is the resurrection and the life I think personally that someone has to understand that there is a life after death also I think they have to understand that there is a life after death in order to to be to Kevin so I don't think you can't can be eternally saved if you don't understand that there is a life after death that's something that I believe but even those who who believe on his name it says even those who believe on his name so you can believe on the name of Jesus Christ and then you are a seeker and as a seeker you can find out more and come to faith and it turn be eternally saved and so on so but that was another that was a diversion I was digressing from this stuff so Mike think that that Jack's Mac is insecure and projecting his his own weakness on to Mike while I believe personally that Jack's Mac is not insecure in his necessarily because Jack's Mac knows that he's not gonna face Mike physically in in a fight and a way where you live in society whether in California or in Sweden that is a civilized society and you don't have to fight people and so on you you have to have a certain amount of strength to be able to walk around and do whatever you're doing and so on but you don't need to win a fight that's just how society is set up today and but you do have to have or you don't have to have but it's good for you to have some kind of independence in life and that kind of independence you can get from from being a lawnmower guy you know or from selling books or whatever or from having some employment or whatever or just from you know you can have independence also if you if you don't have work but but I think as a believer you can you can have that because God can protect you but I see this short that is done by Jack's back against Mike more like more like more like projecting this stuff about the Californian spirit of of the American we have the American dream the Californian spirit and this versus more more board the institutionalized maybe spirit Swedish institutionalized maybe there's also this Catholic versus Baptist the Baptist being you know that there could be this Catholic also there is a Catholic versus Baptist difference in between different believers and so on yeah but so yeah I think that's it I don't know if I'm gonna say any more

References

AI Disclosure: Parts of this page may have been created, edited, or assisted by artificial intelligence tools (such as ChatGPT or other language models). All AI-assisted content is reviewed by a human before publication. For questions, contact the site administrator.